8/7/2023 0 Comments Postgresql similarIn that same year, it hired several more, and even today PostgreSQL experience is called out for in dozens of jobs advertised on the company’s career page. In 2013, Salesforce hired Tom Lane, a prominent PostgreSQL developer. If, in fact, Salesforce is developing a homegrown replacement for Oracle’s database, it might well be building it on PostgreSQL, the database Salesforce has actively flirted with since 2012. Nor is it alone: MongoDB counts more than 6,000 customers, indicating broad interest in moving beyond Oracle for modern applications.Īnd yet Salesforce’s database wanderlust points to a different database than MongoDB that could spoil Oracle’s dominance. Even so, the fact that the SaaS vendor opted to put money into an Oracle database rival suggests an interest in keeping a foot firmly planted outside the Oracle camp. Indeed, Salesforce’s MongoDB investment is a rounding error in MongoDB’s current $1.9 billion market cap. Seen this way, the MongoDB investment is no big deal. With investments as varied as Twilio, Jitterbit, and SessionM, Salesforce has been a very active investor with tens of millions of dollars plowed into dozens of companies. Salesforce has been an active investor in a variety of startups over the years, using such investments to strategically keep a pulse on the market (while keeping competitors out). ![]() Between the two investments, Salesforce’s MongoDB investment represents 6 percent of its institutional holdings, the second-largest such investment it has made. As reported, Salesforce just increased its investment in NoSQL leader MongoDB by nearly 45,000 shares, having first invested while MongoDB was still a private company. Although attempts to build its own database are relatively new, Salesforce’s attempts to look at rival databases has been going on for years, most recently with MongoDB. Shopping around for database freedomĪnd so Salesforce has been looking for alternatives to Oracle. Even if Oracle weren’t a fierce Salesforce competitor (and it is), having another vendor-any vendor-own such a critical part of a company’s data infrastructure necessarily reduces its agility. Even so, and despite a 2013 megadeal between Salesforce and Oracle to cement Salesforce’s dependence on the database giant for nine years, Salesforce has never really stopped shopping around for alternatives. With nearly two decades invested in Oracle, the pain involved in moving off Oracle would be substantial. Such entanglement has been particularly strong at Salesforce. around a particular tool, that doesn’t get lifted and shifted easily, something that Gartner calls ‘entanglement.’” The only thing keeping the wheels on that train is inertia: “When someone has invested in the schema design, physical data placement, network architecture, etc. As Gartner analyst Merv Adrian has made clear, although Oracle still has a commanding lead in database market share, it has bled share every year since 2013. Lately, however, the wheels seem to be wobbling on its database gravy train. Oracle has dominated the database industry for decades, using that heft to catapult it into enterprise applications and other adjacent markets. This looking beyond Oracle shouldn’t be happening With Silicon Valley at the vanguard of change, Salesforce’s infidelity to Oracle could be a sign of, or at least a spark to, a broader shift in enterprise database decisions. This comes on the heels of Salesforce adding to its investment in NoSQL database leader MongoDB, which compounds the company’s long-standing interest in PostgreSQL. Despite being filled with Oracle veterans, can’t seem to stop flirting with rival databases, with reports surfacing that the SaaS vendor has made “significant progress” to move away from Oracle with its own homegrown database.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |